By Chun In-bum
Chun In-bum
President Yoon Suk Yeol's approval rating has dropped to an all-time low of between 17 and 27 percent, with disapproval rates exceeding 65 percent. A key reason for this decline is the public perception that Yoon and his administration failed to communicate effectively with the people, compounded by persistent political attacks from the opposition.
These domestic challenges stand in stark contrast to the view held by U.S. officials and many Americans with firsthand experience in Korea-U.S. relations. From their perspective, Yoon's foreign policy is seen as a resounding success, and they view the relationship between the two countries as the strongest in its 75-year history.
While there are concerns that Korea may be alienating itself from key markets like China, economic ties between Korea and the U.S. remain robust. The U.S. security commitment to Korea is stronger than ever, bolstered by initiatives like the Nuclear Consultative Group, which continues to enhance mutual understanding and reassurance. Yoon's foreign policy has also extended to bold initiatives with Japan. In a single stroke, Yoon has set aside long-standing grievances and made unilateral overtures to improve relations, as evidenced by his visit to Japan in March 2023, which opened new channels for political interaction between the two nations.
However, Yoon's initiatives toward Japan have sparked significant controversy, particularly from his political rivals. These rivals have historically focused on leveraging public resentment against Japan to consolidate their support base. By ignoring previous agreements and weaponizing the legal system to focus on the letter of the law, they have created the impression that Korea is not a trustworthy partner in international affairs. Yoon's boldest move — standing firm against allegations regarding the release of treated water from Fukushima — further inflamed these tensions. While these moves have been pivotal in strengthening foreign relations, they have contributed to Yoon's declining popularity domestically.
The concern now, particularly among U.S. and Japanese officials, is that a shift in Korean leadership back to the political left could lead to a dramatic reversal of the progress made in international relations, much as it shifted to the right under Yoon. Some officials have resigned themselves to this possibility, viewing the current state of affairs as a moment to "make the best while we can." However, there are steps that can be taken to reinforce these ties and help secure the benefits of Yoon's foreign policy initiatives for the future.
One such step would be for the U.S. to consider the broader implications of its trade policies on key allies like Korea. For example, applying tariffs on Korean imports without considering the second- and third-order effects on these valuable allies could undermine the economic and security cooperation that benefits all parties involved. These economic decisions must take into account the critical role Korea plays in U.S. security, particularly in industries like technology and semiconductors.
Another crucial step lies with Japanese leadership. Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama's 1995 statement, in which he expressed deep remorse for Japan's colonial rule and wartime aggression, remains a powerful symbol of reconciliation. If current Japanese leaders were to reiterate this apology to the Korean people, it could significantly ease tensions and foster long-term cooperation. Such a gesture, while politically risky in Japan, would demonstrate true leadership by looking beyond immediate popularity and focusing on the benefits to future generations. Similarly, Japanese leaders could build goodwill by refraining from visiting the Yasukuni Shrine, an act that would resonate positively with the Korean public.
Yoon's leadership, particularly in its approach to foreign policy, is an example of the difficult but necessary decisions that long-term national interests require. His administration is advancing Korea's strategic alignment with both the U.S. and Japan, even at the cost of domestic popularity. But true leadership requires a vision that extends beyond the present. By fostering stronger trilateral relations between Korea, the U.S. and Japan, Yoon is laying the groundwork for a more stable and prosperous Northeast Asia.
For these reasons, it is critical that the U.S., Japan and Korea continue to build on the progress made during Yoon's administration. By addressing economic concerns, reaffirming mutual apologies and reinforcing security commitments, these nations can secure lasting peace and economic growth for future generations.
Chun In-bum ([email protected]) served as a lieutenant general in the ROK Army and was commander of Special Forces Korea.
English (United States) ·