SHARE
Eran Wickramaratne | Karu Jayasuriya | Ramesh Pathirana | Vasudeva Nanayakkara

There were three potential common candidates for the Opposition before last November: Karu Jayasuriya, Ranil Wickremesinghe, and Sajith Premadasa. All three were from the UNP. Their base was from that party. As such it made sense to splinter the government and this through a key loyalist of the ruling party, the SLFP. Well, it’s been eight months since Maithripala Sirisena walked out on his former boss, but with an election around the corner and the man pleading neutrality, both parties are on their own.

If it’s a fight between these two then it’s over who has cleaner records. The UNP might win on this count, at least as far as “clean and honest” is a slogan that guarantees votes and majorities. But this isn’t just about slogans. It’s about individuals and faces. In this respect the Greens have that proverbial lion’s share.

They’ve got names: Eran Wickramaratne, Harsha de Silva, and Sujeewa Senasinghe. That’s three among many others, moreover. What matters is track record. Yes, Senasinghe didn’t do himself any favours over the Bond scam or those posters adorning nearly every corner in Colombo. But the other two stand out. If it all boils down to honest leadership, rational voters (who measure relative merits and privilege reason over emotion) will lend unconditional support.

Does this bode well for the UNP? Not really. “Young” doesn’t really guarantee anything in politics. To be fair, “old” doesn’t either. But J. R. Jayewardene was almost as old as S. W. R. D. Bandaranaike (who was his colleague in the UNP once) when he was elected in 1977, 20 years after the latter was shot. Premadasa wasn’t young. Nor was Wijetunga. Nor were Kumaratunga and Rajapaksa.

We’re not talking about the presidency here, though. We’re talking about entering Parliament, a different scenario altogether.
Harsha and Eran have shown qualities rarely to be met with in politicians here: charisma, humility, and forbearance. Neither of them has engaged in trashing opponent. Neither of them has sacred cows, obeisance to party leadership notwithstanding. And more importantly, neither of them has taken sides over the Ranil vs Sajith fight in their party.

In this context what have the Blues got? They have names. Those are old(er). Vasudeva Nanayakkara has been at in politics since 1958 and in parliament since 1970. Roughly the same can be said of Dinesh Gunawardena and Wimal Weerawansa. Even Ramesh Pathirana, whose honesty and appeal have never been in doubt (and not only due to his father’s legacy), seems like “old wine” compared to what the UNP has to offer.

Not that this foretells doom for that party, of course. It all depends on how it can tap into its strengths. No, this is not (only) about the “Mahinda Resurgence”. There’s a lot more the UPFA can use. For one thing, the last 10 years weren’t merely about deals and commissions. Those who obtained ministerial posts did something. That “something”, in relation to the “nothing” which got done in these six months, adds up. Makes sense to build up support around this.

Counterclaims can be made. That’s how the UNP will fight back. Allegations of malpractice, cronyism, and money laundering are up for grabs. Its “new fleece”, furthermore, has demonstrated values which can persuade any reason-driven voter to get it into Parliament and which are at odds with what the UPFA has as “alternatives”. Sure, those who vote for it can include the kepuwath kola crowd, i.e. voters who’ll even support politicians with dubious pasts as long as they’re with “The Party”. They’ll figure in at the election too. That’s inevitable however, a “given” so to speak.

What’s relevant is the rift between the two contenders: “Old Guard” versus “New Fleece”. Both have an advantage over one another. Memories of Rajapaksa’s malpractices can work in the UNP’s favor. They’re as good as old however. There are other memories. Recent ones. Like the Bond scandal. These will be dug up too. That’ll play into the UPFA. And the JVP.

In the end there are no saints and angels. Only relative merits.